CRM-M-36167-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 262 CRM-M-36167-2023 Date of Decision: 22.09.2025 SHINDER PAL ...Peoner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Jan Kundu, A.A.G., Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. The present peon has been filed under Secon 482 CrPC for issuance of appropriate direcons to respondents, more parcularly respondent No.2-Director General (Prisons) for transferring the son of the peoner, namely, Gurpreet Singh Gopi, who is presently lodged in Central Jail, Kapurthala from Central Jail, Kapurthala to Central Jail, Ludhiana. 2. At the outset, counsel for the peoner submits that son of the peoner’s confinement in mulple cases and he would be contended and sasfied, in case he is permi4ed to file a fresh representaon in terms of Prisons Rules and concerned authority be directed to decide the same in a me bound manner. 3. Noces are served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondents nor the issuance of noces to the private respondents is required. 4. Let the peoner file a representaon, supported by a notarized affidavit, to the concerned Inspector General of Police (Prisons) within two weeks from today. If the peoner files such representaon within the above-menoned me period of two weeks, then, the same shall be decided by the concerned Inspector General of Police (Prisons) within two months, either himself/herself or by authorizing and delegang it to any officer holding IPS cadre. It is clarified that such order must be a reasoned order, and the same be communicated to the representaonists without delay. In the representaon, peoner to menon the email id of his counsel so that the concerned officer could communicate him the outcome. JYOTI 2025.09.25 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-36167-2023 5. Liberty reserved to the peoner to file fresh peon or to take other legal remedies in accordance with the law. 6. It is clarified that there is no adjudicaon on merits. It is further clarified that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogaon of the peoners is required in any cognizable case. 7. There would be no need for a cerfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Peoner and State can download this order and other relevant parculars from the official web page of this court and aest it to be a true copy. The concerned officer can also verify its authencity and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use. Pe--on is allowed to the extent men-oned above. All pending applicaons, if any, stand disposed. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 22.09.2025 Jyo-II Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No. JYOTI 2025.09.25 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.