Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68286 (PNJ)

AMRIK SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/5972/2025 · 2025-06-04

Anil Kshetarpal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5972-2025 -1- 202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5972-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 04.06.2025 Amrik Singh ...Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Manmeet Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG Haryana. *** ANIL KSHETARPAL , J. (Oral) 1. On 02.06.2025, the following order was passed:- "Prayer in this petition, filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuing a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for the release of detenue, namely Hans Raj, who is father of the present petitioner and has been illegally confined/detained by respondent No. 3- Incharge, Police Station CIA-1, Kurukshetra, District Kurukshetra. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenue, who is father of the petitioner, has been illegally detained by respondent No.3 and is being tortured. He prays for appointing a Warrant Officer so that the detenue could be released from the illegal detention of respondent No. 3. Notice of motion for 04.06.2025. In the meantime, the Registry is directed to appoint a Warrant Officer, who will immediately visit the place(s), as NEERAJ 2025.06.05 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-5972-2025 -2- indicated by the petitioner, and in case, it is found that alleged detenue is in illegal confinement of respondent No.3, he will get him released while following the proper procedure. The expenses to be incurred on the Warrant Officer, as fixed by the Registry, shall be borne by the petitioner himself." The Warrant Officer is directed to submit his report to this Court in a sealed cover on the next date of hearing. 2. Report from the Warrant Officer has been received. Its perusal shows that the petitioner was arrested in FIR No. 82 dated 11.04.2025 under Sections 305, 317(2), 61(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and 253 BNS (added later on). 3. In view of the aforesaid fact, no further order is required to be passed. 4. The petition is disposed of. 5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) 04.06.2025 JUDGE neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No NEERAJ 2025.06.05 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document