Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68282 (CAL)

APURBA ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/11507/2025 · 2025-11-19

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19.11.2025 Item No.6 Ct. No. 30 Aloke WPA 11507 of 2025 Apurba Roy Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Ayan Kr. Boral Ms. Saswati Sengupta … for the petitioners Mr. Sirsanya Bandyopadhy Ms. Tapati Samanta Mr. Arindam Ghosh … for the State 1. Exception to the report filed by the petitioner today be kept with the record. 2. The writ application has been preferred being aggrieved by an order dated 20.03.2025 passed by the respondent no. 3/Sub-Divisional Controller, Food and Supplies, Kandi. 3. It appears that the respondent no. 3/Sub- Divisional Controller has passed the reasoned order on considering the case of the petitioner. 4. The Sub-Divisional Controller/respondent no. 3 has categorically noted at page 10 of the order that an appeal lies against his order before the District Controller, Food and Supplies, Murshidaba. But the petitioner instead of preferring an appeal has preferred this writ application. 5. Considering the said fact, the writ application is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal under the appropriate provisions of law within 15 days from the date of this 2 order. The period of delay is condoned in the interest of justice. 6. The District Controller shall make all endeavour to dispose of the appeal in accordance with law within 60 days from the date of filing of the appeal by passing a reasoned order, on hearing the parties. 7. WPA 11507 of 2025 is accordingly disposed of. 8. There will be no order as to costs. 9. Connected application, if any, stands disposed of. 10. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 11. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)