1 2025:CGHC:8026 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1201 of 2025 Shivani Sharma D/o Shri Subhash Sharma Aged About 35 Years R/o House No. C-19, Rajaswa Colony, Sarkanda, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Directorate of Employment and Training (Training Wing) Through - Director, Block- 4, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, (C.G.) 3 - The Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Vyapam Bhawan, North Block, Sector 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Dr. C.V. Raman University Through- Joint Registrar, Kargi Road Kota, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. J.K. Gupta, Advocate For Respondents-State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. G.A. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 14.02.2025 1. Heard Mr. J.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. Shailja Shukla, learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for the State and Mr. Avinash Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.3. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.02.17 15:01:56 +0530 2 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following relief(s):- “10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records concerning the case of the petitioner from the possession of the respondents, for its kind perusal. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction and quash the rejection order and direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for the appointment of Training Officer. 10.3 Any other relief or reliefs that may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed a representation before the concerned respondent authorities, which has not been considered and decided till date. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to file fresh representation before the concerned respondent authorities and prayed that a direction may be given to the concerned respondent authorities to consider and decide the same within considerable time frame. 5. Be that as it may, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the concerned respondent authority within a 3 period of 10 days ventilating her grievance along with the documents annexed with this petition and the concerned respondent authorities are directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in a pragmatic manner within a period of 45 days from the date of filing of representation of the petitioner. 6. With the aforementioned observation/direction, instant writ petition is disposed of. - Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh