- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39891 CRL.RP No. 431 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 431 OF 2023 BETWEEN: RAGHAVENDRA @ RAGHU S/O SHIVAPPA (IN THE ORDER NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN MENTIONED AS RAGHAVENDRA DABHA S/O SHIVAPPA) AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE AND AGRICULTURIST, R/O VARAMBALLI, JAYANAGARA, HOSANAGARA POST AND TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 418. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJ M. BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. R.B. DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY POLICE SUB INSPECTOR, HOSANAGARA TOWN POLICE STATION, HOSANAGARA, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 418 (REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, BENGALURU - 560 001) …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DIWAKAR MADDUR, HCGP) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39891 CRL.RP No. 431 of 2023 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 03.03.2023 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE SAGAR SUB DIVISION, SAGAR IN MAG. (GADIPARU) VIVA 497/2021-22 AND ITS CONSEQUENTIAL PROCEEDINGS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging order dated 03.03.2023 passed by Assistant Commissioner and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sagar Sub- Division, Sagar, this Revision Petition is filed. 2. Sri Nagaraj M.Bhat, learned counsel for petitioner submitted under impugned order Assistant Commissioner and Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sagar Sub-Division, Sagar, passed an order of 'externment' of petitioner from Sagar Sub-Division to Ballari District for a period of one year from 03.03.2023 to 03.03.2024. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39891 CRL.RP No. 431 of 2023 3. It was submitted that on said order this Court had granted an interim order of stay and during pendency of this petition, said period has lapsed. 4. In view of above, learned counsel for petitioner submitted order impugned having been spent, Revision Petition has become infructuous. 5. Submission is not opposed. 6. Hence, Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22 CT: BHK