[2025:RJ-JP:31609] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 875/2006 1. Noor Mohammed S/o Shri Ibrahim Mohammad, aged about 25 years, R/o Ward No.13, Vyapari Mohalla, Madanganj- Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) 2. Firoj S/o Shri Ramjan aged about 26 years R/o Ward No.13, Vyapari Mohalla, Madanganj-Kishangarh, District Ajmer (Rajasthan) (At present both are confined in Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Accused/Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioners : Mr. K.A. Khan, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, Addl.G.A. Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 13/08/2025 1. This criminal revision petition has been filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. challenging the judgment dated 31.05.2006 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track No.3, Ajmer Camp, Kishangarh (hereinafter referred to as the 'Sessions Court') in Criminal Appeal Nos.6/2005 and 7/2005 whereby learned Sessions Court dismissed the appeals filed by the petitioners and affirmed the conviction and sentence awarded to the petitioners vide order dated 06.05.2004 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarh, District [2025:RJ-JP:31609] (2 of 3) [CRLR-875/2006] Ajmer (hereinafter referred to as the 'trial Court') in Criminal Case No.309/2003. 2. Vide impugned order dated 06.05.2004, passed by learned trial Court, the petitioners were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 326, 324 and 120-B of IPC and were sentenced as under:- i. Under Section 326 of IPC-Seven years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.50,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo one and half years' rigorous imprisonment, ii. Under Section 324 of IPC-Two years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo one and half years' rigorous imprisonment & iii.Under Section 120-B of IPC-Three years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo one and half years' rigorous imprisonment. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits the custody certificates of the petitioners, according to which the petitioners have served their sentence and have been released on bail. As per custody certificates, the amount of fine against the petitioners has already been deposited by them. The custody certificates of the petitioners are taken on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not want to contest this petition on merits. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that both the petitioners have served their sentence and deposited the fine as awarded, this petition is liable to be disposed of. [2025:RJ-JP:31609] (3 of 3) [CRLR-875/2006] 6. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed. 7. Stay application and all other pending applications also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /07