GURDEV SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CWP/17150/2025 · 2025-07-03
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68264 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68264 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-17150-2025 CWP-17169-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 269+270
1.
GURDEV SINGH
STATE OF HARYANA AND
2.
DIWAN CHAND
STATE OF HARYANA AND
CORAM: HON'BLE MR
Present: Mr. S. K. Malik, Advocate for the
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
The certiorari quashing the employees in the Department.
2.
Learned State counsel contends that during pendency of the petitions the transfer drive has dated 05.06.2025 Grievance Redressal Committee grievance concerning the transfer on that account. 2025 with 2025
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Decided On:
CWP-17150-2025 GURDEV SINGH AND OTHERS
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CWP-17169-2025 DIWAN CHAND AND OTHERS
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. S. K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) These petitions have been filed, quashing the communication dated employees in the Department. Learned State counsel contends that during pendency of the the transfer drive has been concluded by passing of the transfer order
05.06.2025. She also contends that the Department has se Grievance Redressal Committee for the affected employees to grievance concerning the transfers by giving details of the on that account. In case the petitioners are aggrieved by the transfer order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided On: 03.07.2025
....PETITIONER(s)
....RESPONDENT(s)
....PETITIONER(s)
....RESPONDENT(s)
. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of communication dated 27.05.2025, for transfer of Learned State counsel contends that during pendency of the concluded by passing of the transfer order that the Department has set up a for the affected employees to raise their by giving details of the hardships suffered are aggrieved by the transfer order writ of , for transfer of Learned State counsel contends that during pendency of the concluded by passing of the transfer order a their suffered are aggrieved by the transfer order Aman Dua 2025.07.08 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document
CWP-17150-2025 CWP-17169-2025
dated 05.06.2025 new place of posting submit representation decided by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law. 3. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) has no objection to the petition thereof. 4. Ordered
5. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file. 03.07.2025 Ad Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? 2025 with 2025
-2-
dated 05.06.2025, pursuant whereof they have place of posting(s) (except petitioner no.7 submit representation(s) to the Committee decided by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the has no objection to the petition Ordered accordingly. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? , pursuant whereof they have already joined their respective (except petitioner no.7 in CWP-17150-2025), they can which will be considered and decided by passing a speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the has no objection to the petitions being disposed of in terms A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No their respective , they can which will be considered and In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the being disposed of in terms Aman Dua 2025.07.08 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document