IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 222-A CWP-5335-2013 (O&M) Date of decision : 17.03.2025 RAJDEEP BUS SERVICE REGD., KHANNA ...... Petitioner VERSUS THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present :- Mr. Rohit Kapoor, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Akshita Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one of the permit yet to be allocated, is still lying vacant hence, liberty be granted to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned for making a request to grant the said permit in favour of the petitioner by filing appropriate application/representation which may be decided by the authorities in accordance with law in a time bound manner. 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case, any such claim is raised, appropriate speaking order will be passed by the competent authority within a period of 08 weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to grant the permit to the petitioner, the same will be granted, RIMPAL RANI 2025.03.24 11.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-5335-2013 :2: otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioner in the speaking order to be passed and the said order will be conveyed to the petitioner for his information and necessary action. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned State counsel, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 17.03.2025 Rimpal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable : No RIMPAL RANI 2025.03.24 11.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document