CRM-M-34876-2024 -1- 102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34876-2024 Date of decision: 01.05.2025 MMM ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present:- Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surinder Kumar Dagar, DAG, Haryana. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that anticipatory bail was granted to respondent No.2 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Special Court to try the offences of rape and under POCSO Act), Kurukshetra vide Annexure P-3 and the petitioner is alleging misuse of anticipatory bail but she has not filed any application before the same Court which had granted anticipatory bail to respondent No.2 i.e. Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Special Court to try the offences of rape and under POCSO Act), Kurukshetra seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition in order to enable the petitioner to invoke the remedy available to her in accordance with law by moving an appropriate application before the learned CHETAN THAKUR 2025.05.01 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-34876-2024 -2- Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Special Court to try the offences of rape and under POCSO Act), Kurukshetra, who had granted the concession of anticipatory bail to respondent No.2. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) 01.05.2025 JUDGE Chetan Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No CHETAN THAKUR 2025.05.01 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.