Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68244 (PNJ)

MUKEEM v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/32327/2025 · 2025-06-17

Anil Kshetarpal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32327-2025 Date of decision : 17.06.2025 Mukeem ...Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Satbir Singh Kanwar, Advocate Ms. Radhika Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sharan Sethi, Addl. A.G. Haryana. *** ANIL KSHETARPAL , J. (Oral) 1. Learned State counsel submits that viscera chemical analysis report has been received and the reasons for death is poisoning. He submits that appropriate steps will be taken in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that in view of the aforesaid statement, the present petition is rendered infructuous. 3. Ordered accordingly. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) 17.06.2025 JUDGE neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No NEERAJ 2025.06.17 14:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document