Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68241 (KAR)

SRI M PILLAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/30614/2024 · 2025-07-23

M Nagaprasanna

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27832 WP No. 30614 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 30614 OF 2024 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SRI M PILLAPPA S/O LATE VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, AT NO. 1125/12, 1ST FLOOR, SERVICE ROAD, HAMPINAGAR VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560104 REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI K N SURENDRA S/O NAGU AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHESH M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTREIS, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27832 WP No. 30614 of 2024 REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFFICE AT NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-2 THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB) NO.39, 4TH FLOOR, "SHANTI GRUHA", BHARATH SCOUTS AND GUIDES BUILDING, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VASANTHA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED LAND ACQUISITION NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 BEARING NO. CI 58 SPQ 2024 DTD. 15.03.2024 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28(1) OF KIADB ACT 1966 AT ANNX-A IN RESPECT OF SY.NO. 33 MEASURING 0-30 GUNTAS OF S.MEDAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA-1 HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27832 WP No. 30614 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: MEMO The undersigned counsel for Petitioners herewith submits that, the present petition was filed challenging the preliminary notification, and in view of the final notification datea issued by the Respondents, the present writ petition has become infructuous and the Petitioners are withdrawing the present petition with a liberty to challenge the said final notification. In the circumstances, the Petitioners pray this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the Petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Petition to challenge the final notification in accordance with law. This Memo may be taken on record and render justice." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8