SACHIN KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/5962/2025 · 2025-06-04
Deepak Manchanda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68232 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68232 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-5962-2025 1
116
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-5962-2025
Date of decision: 04.06.2025
SACHIN KUMAR AND ANOTHER
...Petitioners
V/s STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Lalit Mohan Brara, Advocate
for the petitioners.
****
DEEPAK MANCHANDA J. (ORAL)
Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and personal liberty of the petitioners from respondents No.4 to 6.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioner No.2 is married with respondent No.4, who used to harass petitioner No.2 everyday. He further contends that both the petitioners from their free will have agreed to stay in a live-in-relationship and are major. In support thereof, copies of Aadhaar Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended. He also contends that petitioners submitted a representation dated 28.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Ambala but the same has not been decided till date. It is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners would be satisfied if the representation dated 28.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) is decided by the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Ambala.
3.
Notice of motion restricted to respondent Nos. 1 to 3, only.
SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.06.04 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRWP-5962-2025 2
4.
Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, DAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 and on instructions from ASI Mahender Singh, submits that representation mentioned in the petition as Annexure P-3 has not been received by the concerned Superintendent of Police.
5.
Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition be treated as representation and respondent No.2 may be
directed to decide the same.
6.
In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Ambala to treat the present petition as representation and decide the same after taking into
consideration all the relevant aspects, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, in accordance with law.
7.
The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Ambala for requisite compliance.
(DEEPAK MANCHANDA) 04.06.2025
JUDGE sandeep
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable
Yes/No SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.06.04 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.