Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68231 (BOM)

DEEPAK DIGAMBAR BASTE v. Dinesh B Tidke

CP/979/2025 · 2025-12-09

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

902 CONT. PETITION NO. 979 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CONT. PETITION NO. 979 OF 2025 IN WP/12006/2025 Deepak Digambar Baste And Another VERSUS Dinesh B. Tidke And Others … • Adv. G. B. Patunkar h/f. Adv. Sunil Mahadevappa Vibhute for the Petitioners • Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for State … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 09.12.2025 P E R C O U R T : 1. Learned AGP has placed on record the copy of Roznama of the Committee. He submits that today the petitioners are called for the hearing before the Committee. 2. On instructions, he makes a statement that the Committee will decide the claim of the petitioner within two weeks from today. 3. By recording the said statement as an undertaking to this Court, contempt petition is disposed of. 4. If the Committee fails to decide the claim of the petitioner, it shall be treated as aggravated form of contempt. [VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:35308-DB