- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31852-DB WP No. 7397 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION No. 7397 OF 2025 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL CENTRE, TUMAKURU-572101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI B. RAVINDRANATH, AGA) AND: 1. SRI C. K. NAGARAJU, S/O LATE ASHWATHNARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, WORKING AS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL CENTRE, TUMAKURU, AND ALSO, R/AT EWS 4, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD COLONY, NEAR BISHOP HOUSE, CANTONMENT, BELLARY-583104. Digitally signed by VALLI MARIMUTHU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31852-DB WP No. 7397 of 2025 2. SRI B. MANJUNATH SWAMI, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL CENTRE, CHITRADURGA-577501. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI NARAYAN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI S.R. BALAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30.09.2024 AT ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY HON'BLE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN APPLICATION No.4026 OF 2024. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Sri B. Ravindranath, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the petitioners, files a memo dated 18.08.2025 enclosing the Notification dated 03.04.2025 posting respondent Nos.1 and 2 as Deputy Director, District Industrial Centre, Tumakuru and Deputy Director, District Industrial Centre, Chitragurga, respectively. Thus, learned Additional Government Advocate would submit that the writ petition would no more survive for consideration. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31852-DB WP No. 7397 of 2025 2. Sri Narayan, learned counsel for Sri S.R. Balakirshna, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 would not dispute the said position. 3. In view of the subsequent development as stated above, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE MV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36