ABDUL RAHIM SHEER GOJRI v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE)
WP(C)/736/2025 · 2025-04-02
Javed Iqbal Wani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6822 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6822 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 125 Supp. list
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP ( C ) No. 736/2025 CM No. 1818/2025 Abdul Rahim Sher Gojri ….. Applicant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. A. A Wani, Advocate.
V/s. UT of J&K & Ors. ….. Respondent(s) Through: -
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
(ORDER) 02.04.2025 1 Short grievance projected in the instant petition by the petitioner filed under Article 226 of the Constitution is that though he has made an application before the respondent 3 herein for effecting correction in the relevant revenue records qua land covered under Survey No. 889, situated at Hayan Trehgam, Kupwara and though respondent 3 upon entertaining the said application forwarded the same to the Tehsildar for necessary action who in turn referred the same to the Naib-Tehsildar Trehgam being respondents 4 & 5 herein respectively, no action thereof till date has been taken by the respondents, thus, necessitating the filing of the instant petition before this Court.
2. According to the counsel for the petitioner since the respondents have failed to discharge their statutory duty till date in the matter, the petitioner has been left with no option but to seek indulgence of this Court in the matter, thus the counsel for the petitioner would seek disposal of the petition at this stage with an innocuous direction to the respondents in general and respondents 3-5 in particular to consider the matter covered in the aforesaid application and pass appropriate orders without any delay.
3. Having regard to aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of the instant petition at this stage without issuing notice to the respondents and calling for any returns therefrom. Abdul Rashid Ganaie I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents in general and the respondents 3-5 in particular to consider the aforesaid application of the petitioner, uninfluenced by any observation made hereinabove, if not already considered, on its own merits, in accordance with applicable law/rules, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced by the petitioner before the respondents.
5.
Disposed of.
(Javed Iqbal Wani) Judge
SRINAGAR 02.04.2025
“Abdul Rashid”
Abdul Rashid Ganaie I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document