- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33596 WP No. 21074 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 21074 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SRI EDRESS AHMED S/O. ABDUL HAMEED, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.505, RAZAK SAB PALYA, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BAGALUR, KARNATAKA-562149. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RACHITH M L.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, M.S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33596 WP No. 21074 of 2025 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BAGALUR P.S, BENGALURU-562 149. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.K.P. YASHODHA., AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A. ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE E-MAIL COMPLAINT OF THE PETITIONER DATED 13.06.2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND REGISTER FIR IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, FORTHWITH; B. ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 TO FILE A STATUS REPORT WITH REGARD TO COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDER OF THIS HONBLE COURT WITHIN THE STIPULATED TIME PERIOD. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33596 WP No. 21074 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The petitioner, asserting ownership of two sites both measuring 30 feet x 55 feet at Sana Enclave, Sathnur Village, Bengaluru South Taluk relying upon the terms of the sale deed that is executed in his favour, seeks direction to the third respondent to register a FIR against certain third parties based on an email. In fact, the petitioner in paragraph 5 of the memorandum of the writ petition states that these third parties have trespassed into the property. This Court must observe that the dispute is essentially civil in nature and the petitioner must avail appropriate remedy in law. Therefore, the petition stands disposed of subject to all just exceptions. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-