Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6821 (AP)

SMT.SIMMA JHANSI RANI v. M.ANNADORA

CC/1070/2024 · 2025-06-19

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA I CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1070 OF 2024 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for his disobedience of Order Dt. 09.10.2023 passed in W.P No. 26491 of 2023 Between: Smt.Simma Jhansi Rani, W/o Rama Sankara Rao, Aged. 37 years, Occ. Hostel Welfare Officer, O/o G.T.W Girls Hostel (PMH), Pathapatnam, Srikakulam District. willful ...PETITIONER AND M.Annadora, Working as District ST Welfare and Empowerment Officer, Srikakulam, Office Address at D.T.W and E.O Office (D.D.Office), ITDA, Seethampeta Village and Mandal, Parvathipuram Manyam District, PIN- 532443. ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent: SRI M K RAJ KUMAR The Court made the following Order APHC010065462024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1070/2024 Between; Smt.simma Jhansi Rani ...PETITIONER AND M Annadora Counsel for the Petitioner: ...CONTEMNOR 1. SRI NIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Contemnor: 1.M KRAJ KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.26491 of 2023, dated 09.10.2023, wherein this Court passed the following order:- “In view of the pendency of the representation, dated 11.09.2023 made by the petitioner before the respondent authorities, without going into merits of the case, this Court feeis it appropriate to dispose of {he writ petition directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation, dated 11.09.2023 made by the petitioner duiy taking into consideration of the order, dated 12.02.2021 through which proceedings the annuai periodicai increments were sanctioned in favour of the petitioner. The said process shaii be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. Srinivas Ambati, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.26491 of 2023, dated 09.10.2023 has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, prays to close the contempt case. 2. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Sd/- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. M.Annadora, Working as District ST Welfare and Empowerment Officer, Srikakulam, Office Address at D.T.W and E.O Office (D.D.Office), ITDA, Seethampeta Village and Mandal, Parvathipuram Manyam District, PIN- 532443. 2. One CC to Sri. Srinivas Ambati Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. M K Raj Kumar Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies RAM HIGH COURT DATED :20/06/2025 ORDER CC.No.1070 of 2024 SfP 2025% ^ Current section ^ ov m CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS