- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53411 WP No. 1316 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 1316 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI GOPINATH S/O NARAYANAPPA AND SMT MUNIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT GATTAKAMADHENAHALLI MAJARA PITCHAHALLI VILLAGE ROBERTSONPET HOBLI, K.G.F TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 121. 2. SRI RAVI S/O SRI GOPINATH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT GATTAKAMADHENAHALLI MAJARA PITCHAHALLI VILLAGE ROBERTSONPET HOBLI, K.G.F TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT -563 121. 3. SRI SRINIVAS S/O SRI GOPINATH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT GATTAKAMADHENAHALLI MAJARA PITCHAHALLI VILLAGE ROBERTSONPET HOBLI, K.G.F TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 121. 4. SRI MANJU S/O SRI GOPINATH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT GATTAKAMADHENAHALLI MAJARA PITCHAHALLI VILLAGE ROBERTSONPET HOBLI, K.G.F TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 121. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI RAMESH K.S, ADV.) Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53411 WP No. 1316 of 2024 AND: SRI. NAGENDRA M.S S/O M.S SURYANARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT GATTAKAMADHENAHALLI MAJARA PITCHAHALLI VILLAGE ROBERTSONPET HOBLI, K.G.F TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563121. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI CHANDRACHOODA M.B, ADV., FOR C/R) THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ORDER DTD 23.09.2023 ANNEXURE-F PASSED ON IA NO.4, BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL JMFC AT KGF IN O.S.NO.294/2019. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER 1. Matter called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 2. This Court on 05.12.2025 had passed the following order:- "Matter is listed for eighth time to comply the office objections. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. However, in the interest of justice, the matter is finally adjourned to 15.12.2025. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53411 WP No. 1316 of 2024 By the next date of hearing if the office objections are not complied, the petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution. Re-list this matter on 15.12.2025." 3. Even as on this date, office objections have not been complied and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Under the circumstances and in view of the peremptory order passed by this Court on 05.12.2025, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11