- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46098 WP No. 32309 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ WRIT PETITION NO. 32309 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: XXXX XXXX XXXX …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARENDRA DEV H.N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. NASIR HYDER @ NASIR S/O SHIEK BAHADUR, AGED MAJOR, R/AT NO.6/2, 3RD CROSS, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, BENGALURU - 33. 2. SHAFIQ AHAMED @ SHAFIQ, S/O SYED RAFIQ AHAMED, AGED MAJOR, R/A NO.198, 1ST FLOOR, 7TH CROSS, 3RD STAGE, PILLANNA GARDEN, BENGALURU. 3. SHOYAB @SHEIK KALFAN @ SHOYEB SHEIKH MOHAMMAD, AGED MAJOR, Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46098 WP No. 32309 of 2025 R/AT NO.68, 2ND CROSS, DODDANNA LAYOUT, VENKATESHAPURA, KADUGONDANAHALLI, BENGALURU. 4. MOHAMMED HAFIZ, S/O ABDUL RAZAK, AGED MAJOR, R/AT NO.22/1, SABHAPATHI LINE, ARMSTRONG ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU. 5. MOHAMMAD ISHQ SOUDH @ SOUDH, S/O LATE MOHAMMAD MUSTAFA ASLAM, AGED MAJOR, R/AT NO.4, DHANAKOTI LAYOUT, THIMMAIAH ROAD, BHARATHI NAGAR, BENGALURU. 6. STATE OF KARNATAKA, PULAKESHI NAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT/ORDER DATED 21.10.2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE LIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS SPECIAL JUDGE, BANGALORE IN S.C. NO.1320/2014 C/W S.C. NO.907/2016, TO THE EXTENT OF THE INADEQUATE SENTENCE IMPOSED ON RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 5 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46098 WP No. 32309 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Office has raised an objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim has preferred this petition seeking enhancement of sentence imposed by the learned Sessions Judge for the offence punishable under Section 376, 364-A, 395 and 506 r/w Section 149 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The Learned counsel submits that he may be permitted to file a Criminal Revision Petition and with that liberty he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. 4. With liberty sought for, petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 6. The Registry shall return the certified copy of the judgment furnished along with the petition, retaining the photostat copy of the same. Sd/- (MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE VS, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26