Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6820 (MAD)

P.RAJALAKSHMI v. The District Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./551/2025 · 2026-06-09

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 551 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 551 of 2025 P.Rajalakshmi W/o.Prabhu, No.885, New Street Navlog, Puliankannau, Walaja Taluk, Ranipet ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Superintendent of Police Bharathi nagar SIPCOT ranipet District Ranipet 2. The Inspector of Police SIPCOT Police Station, Ranipet District 3. P.Thiyagarajan S/o.Pandurangan, No.514D, Thengal main Road, Walaja Taluk, Ranipet District-632 404 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to take suitable legal action against the 3red respondent and to considering the petitioners representation dated 16.07.2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government for R1 & R2 Mr.C.Prakasam for R3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 551 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This petition has been filed seeking direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents to take suitable legal action against the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioners representation dated 16.07.2025. 2. Learned Government Counsel on instructions would submit that the petitioner’s complaint has been enquired and FIR was registered in Crime No.121 of 2025 and after registration of FIR, 2nd respondent filed final report and has been taken cognizance in S.T.C.No.676 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet and it is pending trail. 3. It is seen that subsequently there was another complaint lodged by the petitioner seeking police protection to stay in her house. Admittedly, petitioner and 3rd respondent are partners in business and there was a partnership dispute between them and now 3rd respondent is in possession and enjoyment of the house. Therefore, when the 3rd respondent is in possession and enjoyment of the property, police protection cannot be granted to enjoy the property. Therefore, direction sought for in this petition cannot be considered. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 551 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, petitioner is at liberty to approach the civil Court in accordance with law. 09-06-2026 SMA To 1. The District Superintendent of Police Bharathi nagar SIPCOT ranipet District Ranipet 2. The Inspector of Police SIPCOT Police Station, Ranipet District 3. P.Thiyagarajan S/o.Pandurangan, No.514D, Thengal main Road, Walaja Taluk, Ranipet District-632 404 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 551 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. SMA WP Crl. No. 551 of 2025 09-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis