SMT.B.L.GOURAMMA W/O LATE N. MAHESHWARAYYA v. SURESH B P S/O LATE PAPANNA
MFA/103892/2019 · 2025-02-07
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6819 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6819 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2419 MFA No. 103892 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.103892 OF 2019 (ECA)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. B.L. GOURAMMA W/O. LATE N. MAHESHWARAYYA, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
2.
SMT. VASANTA W/O. LATE MANJUNATHA, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: NIL,
3.
SUBAS S/O. LATE MANJUNATHA, AGE: 15 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
SINCE APPELLANT NO.3 IS MINOR AS SUCH REP. BY M/G I.E. APPELLANT NO.2/MOTHER
ALL THE APPELLANTS ARE R/O: CHAMUNIDPURA POST: AYANUR, TQ. AND DIST: SHIVAMOGGA, NOW AT HALAGERI, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581208. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI G.S. HULMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SURESH B P S/O. LATE PAPANNA, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: NH-4, MEDIHALLI, VIDYANAGAR, TQ: AND DIST: CHITRADURGA-577501.
2.
THE MANAGER, (LAW DIVISION) RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2419 MFA No. 103892 of 2019
V K KALABURGI SQUARE, DESAI CROSS, HUBBALLI-580029. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SUBHASH J.BADDI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R1-NOTICE NOT YET SERVED)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 30(1) OF THE EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923, PRAYING TO MODIFY THE ORDER PASSED BY THE III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND AMACT, RANEBENNUR IN E.C.A.NO.37/2018 DATED 29.06.2019 AND ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION AS PRAYED FOR ALONG WITH COST OF THE APPEAL AND ETC.,.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR)
Learned counsel for the appellants and respondent Insurance Company have filed a joint memo stating that the matter is settled for Rs.2,85,000/-. Therefore, prays to dispose of the appeal in terms of the joint memo.
2. The joint memo and the submission of the
learned counsel are placed on record. Hence, the appeal is
disposed of in terms of the joint memo. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE MRK /CT: UMD. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3