SAJIDA AKHTER (LADAKH CASE) v. TSERING PALDAN AND ANR. (SCHOOL EDUCATION)
CCP(D)/12/2025 · 2025-08-18
Rajnesh Oswal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6819 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6819 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(1751/2025) IN CCP(D) 12/2025 SAJIDA AKHTER …Petitioner(s)/appellant(s) Through: Mr. Bhat Fayaz, Advocate
Vs.
TSERING PALDAN AND ANR. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
O R D E R 18-08-2025
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order and
judgment dated March 13, 2025 rendered by the Coordinate Bench has since been complied, for the necessary orders have been passed by the Joint Director, School Education Department, Ladakh on July 23, 2025. He has shared with us a copy of the order which is taken on record as marked ‘X’. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing substantive survives in the petition and the same be disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. However, the petitioner, if so advised, would assail the order dated July 23, 2025 in appropriate proceedings.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE
CHIEF JUSTICE
SRINAGAR 18-08-2025 Aamir