C/M SRI PRAHALAD SMARAK AYURVEDIC PHARMACY AND NURSING COLLEGE v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/20105/2025 · 2025-07-23
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68140 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68140 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121887 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20105 of 2025 Petitioner :- C/M Sri Prahalad Smarak Ayurvedic Pharmacy And Nursing College Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jai Krishna Tiwari Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:-
"1. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.4 to declare the results. 2. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.4 to forward the result / data of the students before the respondent No.3 for consideration of scholarship. 3. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 3 to open the portal for submission of result and accepting the scholarship data and further release the scholarship forthwith."
2. Sri J.K. Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4 - Registrar, Ayurvedic and Unani Tibbi Chikitsha Padhati Board, Lucknow submitted that as per instructions dated 26.06.2025, the result has already been declared. 3. Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondent nos.1 to 3 submitted and undertaken that since the result has already been declared by respondent no.4, the State will take proper steps to open the portal for submission of result. 4. Heard Sri Prashant Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State- respondent nos.1 to 3, Sri Jai Krishna Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4, the contents made in the writ petition and documents on record. 5. Taking into consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, I am of the view that no useful purpose would be served to keep the matter pending for further adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent nos. 1 to 3 to open the portal as undertaking given by learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, within two weeks, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if no other impediment. .
(Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad