- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30728 MFA No. 5550 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5550/2018 (MV-D) BETWEEN: K. RAVIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, S/O KRISHNAPPA, NINGEGOWDANADODDI VILLAGE, MANCHANAYAKANAHALLI -562 109, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TQ & DIST. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VINAYA KEERTHY M., ADVOCATE(ABSENT)) AND: 1. JAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, W/O LATE DODDAHONNAIAH, HALASINAMARADODDI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI & POST -562 109, RAMANGARA TALUK & DISTRICT-562 159. 2. SHASHIKALA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, D/O LATE DODDAHONNIAH, W/O R SATISHA, #52, III CROSS, INDIRANAGARA, BIDADI RAILWAY STATION & POST, RAMANGARA TALUK & DISTRICT-562 159. Digitally signed by MADHURI S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30728 MFA No. 5550 of 2018 3. H D UMESHA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O LATE DODDAHONNAIAH, HALASINAMARADODDI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI & POST-562 109 RAMANAGARA TALUK & DISTRICT-562 159. 4. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE AT # 5/111 & 6/1112, I FLOOR, UNNATI ARCADE, DR. RAJAKUMAR ROAD, I BLOCK, RAJAJINGARA, BENGALOORU-560 010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4, SRI. V. CHANDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:06.06.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.6408/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUDGE & MEMBER MACT, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU [SCCH-18], AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS,5,15,500/- WITH INTEREST @ 9% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL THE DATE OF DEPOSIT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. 2. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 are present. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30728 MFA No. 5550 of 2018 3. Even after listing the matter under the caption for 'Dismissal', he preferred appeal against the award of the Tribunal in MVC.No.6408/2016 dated 06.06.2018. He is the owner of the vehicle and the Tribunal held that, he is liable to pay the compensation and directed to deposit the amount within two months from the date of the order against which he preferred appeal. 4. This Court vide order dated 31.07.2025, directed to deposit 50% of the compensation. But so far, he has not deposited the amount and not even appeared before this Court even after listing the matter under the caption for 'Dismissal'. It appears that, he is not interested to pursue the litigation, no purpose is served. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. SD/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47