CRWP-5953-2025 1 116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5953-2025 Date of decision: 03.06.2025 Sakeel Khan and another ...Petitioners V/s State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Imtiyaz Hussain, Advocate and Mr. Mohd. Shakir Khan, Advocate for the petitioners. **** DEEPAK MANCHANDA J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have approached this Court under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 for protecting their life and liberty from respondents No. 4 and 9. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the petitioners are major, aged about 29 years and 18 years respectively. In support thereof, copies of Aadhaar Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended (Annexures P-1 & P-2). He further contends that the petitioners have performed their marriage against the wishes of their parents according to Muslim Rites and Ceremonies on 31.05.2025. Copy of Nikahnama (Marriage Certificate) (Annexure P-3) has also been appended. He also submits that this is the first marriage of petitioner No.2 and second marriage of petitioner No.1 who has two children from first wife. He also contends that the representation dated 01.06.2025 (Annexures P-4) sent by KUMARI SAPNA 2025.06.03 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement CRWP-5953-2025 2 the petitioners to respondent No. 2-Superintendent of Police, District Nuh has not been decided till date and the petitioners would be satisfied if the representation be decided in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. 4. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and has no objection if appropriate directions are given for deciding the representation submitted by the petitioners. 5. Therefore, without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon, the petition is disposed of with the directions to respondent No. 2-Superintendent of Police, District Nuh to look into the grievance of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation dated 01.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) and take appropriate action for protection of their life and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances in accordance with law. 6. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition to respondent No. 2-Superintendent of Police, District Nuh for requisite compliance. (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) 03.06.2025 JUDGE sapna Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KUMARI SAPNA 2025.06.03 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement