- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28551 RPFC No. 99 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 99 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI. MOHAMMED INAYATULLA KHAN (TAHREEM) S/O MOHAMMED AMANULLAH KHAN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, WORKING IN MAK CONSTRUCTIONS, R/O DOOR NO.5, 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS, RMV 2ND STAGE, ASHWATHNAGARA, BENGALURU-560 039. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SMT. SUFIYA W/O MOHAMMED INAYATULLA KHAN (TAHREEM), AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O C/O DOOR NO.421, K.B.EXTENSION, LAWYERS ROAD, KUVEMPU ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 002. …RESPONDENT THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.02.2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, AT DAVANAGERE IN CRL.MISC.NO.339/2009 BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE REVISION PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28551 RPFC No. 99 of 2022 ORAL ORDER The RPFC is of the year 2022. Till now, no steps are taken for issuance of notice to the respondent. 2. When the matter was listed on 18.7.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of both the parties and no notice is served on the respondent, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for 'dismissal' today. 3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42