I j#`f , lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY`: `l''t) TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^\ :PRESENT.I ''\ '€'T'...?,t- (-r3i_f* THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1389 OF 2025 r Between.I EZi Gopu Usha KumarI', W/o Gopu Srinivas, Aged about 47 years, 3/3, Sri Bhavani Foundation, Deivyasigamani cross street, pallikaranai, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu -600100 Petitioner/Accused No.2 AND The State ofAndhra Pradesh, rep. by publl-c prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. Respondent Petition under Sections 482 of BNSS (old 438 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the PetitI-Oner On Anticipatory Bail in the event of her arrest in crime No.474/2024 on the file of the Bhavanipuram police statl'on, vijayawada. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri D KISHORE' KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the court made the following; 7f, [3396] TUESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA c RI M I N AL ±EI!I!QD!D!Q±J 3 89/l2Q2! Between : Gopu Usha KumariJ AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh counsel for the petitioner/accused: ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT 1.D KISHORE KUMAR counsel for the Respondent/COmPlainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER : The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of BNSS, is filed on behalf of the petitioner herein/Accused No.2 to grant antiCiPatOry bail in COnneCtiOn With crime No.474 of 2024 on the file Of BhavaniPuram Police Station, NTR District for the offences punishable under Sections 336(3), 338, 340(2), 329, 324 r/w 3(5) BNS. ~-_ I _± 2. Heard Sri D.Kishore Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner, who is A-2 herein, is a housewife and never committed any offence much less the alleged offences which are purely foisted with false allegations. The FIR and the report do not state commission of any offence. Learned counsel would further submit that the petitioner purchased the impugned property and accused No.1 executed sale deed with malafide intention in favour of the petitioner along with accused 3 to 5. The petitioner is also sufferer in the said sale transaction and she is also initiating steps to take action against accused No.1 in accordance with law. Learned counsel would further submit that A7 and A8 were granted anticipatory bail by this Court by an order dated 20.12.2024 in Crl.P.No.7179 of 2024. Learned counsel finally prays to enlarge the petitioner herein on anticipatory bail. 4. Perused the record. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would fairly submit that the case of the present petitioner is also on the same footing as of Accused Nos.7 and 8, who have already obtained anticipatory bail from this Court. 6. ln that view of the matter, considering the submissions made, since Accused Nos.7 and 8, who are on the same footing as of Petitioner/Accused a-- --I No.2, were granted antiCiPatOry''bail, this Court is inclined tO grant antiCiPatOry bail to the petitioner herein on the following condit'lOnS. 1) The Petitioner shall appear before the COnCerned Magistrate court, within 15 days from today and Shall furnish a Personal bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand Only) With two sureties for the like sum each, to the satisfaction of concerned Magistrate Courf', 2) The Pet'ltioner Shall be available for investigation aS and When required by the Investigating officer; 3) The Petitioner Shall not, d'lreCtly Or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the present case so as to dissuade h®lm/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Investigating or Police Off'lcer. 4) 'n case Of ViOlat'IOn Of any Of the above conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to take necessary steps for cancellation of the bail. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions Pending, if any, Sha" Stand closed. //TRUE COPY// A ssSsE::J`:A:orvPfffTR#o¥FA:cpsE¥RRAJu:hD ForAoo._._ To, Jr, 1. The S.H.O., Bhavanipuram police station, vI'jayawada,N'TR Dl\* , 2. One CC to SRl. D KISHORE KUMAR Advocate [opuc] 3. Two cos to PubII'C Prosecutor, HI-gh Court ofAP [OUT] 4. One spare copy KJ. HIGH COURT VJP,J DATED..ll/02/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.1389 of 2025 ALLOWED