Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68113 (PNJ)

RAMANDEEP KAUR AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5933/2025 · 2025-06-03

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (108) Ramandeep Kaur and Anr. State of Punjab and Ors. CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, 1. the Constitution of India, seeking the issuance of respondents respondents No. 2. petition, learned counsel for the petitioner petition with liberty to pursue the representation already filed with the authorities. 3. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. June 03, 2025 manju IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Ramandeep Kaur and Anr. Versus State of Punjab and Ors. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Deepak Kumar Bartia, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Samdisha Kaur, Asst. A.G., Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present second petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the issuance of s No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner respondents No.4 to 6. Since there is no threat perception is coming out in the present learned counsel for the petitioners petition with liberty to pursue the representation already filed with the In light of the above, the present petition stands withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5933-2025 Date of Decision:- 03.06.2025 ……Petitioners ……Respondents ALOK JAIN , Advocate for the petitioners. . Samdisha Kaur, Asst. A.G., Punjab. petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the issuance of appropriate directions to to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from ception is coming out in the present s wishes to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to pursue the representation already filed with the In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner and is not a direction. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No .06.2025 s ……Respondents petition has been filed under Article 226 of appropriate directions to from ception is coming out in the present wishes to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to pursue the representation already filed with the dismissed as It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the liberty granted is only on the request of the MANJU 2025.06.04 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document