Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34724 CRL.P No. 7328 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7328 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
RAHAMTHULLA KHAN S/O EBRAHIM KHAN AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
2.
MRS. NUSRATH KHANUM W/O RAHAMATHULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
3.
MOHAMMED KASHIF KHAN R.N S/O RAHAMATHULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS ABOVE 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.3, 1ST CROSS, NOOR-UL-HUDA MASJID BEHIND VINAYAKA THEATRE, ITTEGE ANJANAPPAN LANE MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 018.
4.
KAIF KHAN S/O RAHAMATHULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS NO. 21, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST CROSS DR. TCM RAYAN ROAD, SIDDARTH NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 053. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. T.A. KARUMBAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. HUSSAIN MUEEN FAROOQ, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34724 CRL.P No. 7328 of 2025 AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA COMMERCIAL STREET POLICE, REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PULAKESHINAGAR SUB DIVISION NO.67, COMMERCIAL STREET, TASKER TOWN, SHIVAJINAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
MR. ZAID AHMED KHAN S/O NAZEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT NO.1, E STREET, 3RD CROSS DHARMARAJA KOIL STREET BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL RAI, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE IN CR.NO.0009/2025, REGISTERED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT / COMMERCIAL STREET POLICE, BANGALORE, IN PCR NO.72749/2024, PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE 10TH CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE TAKING COGNIZANCE OF OFFENCES P/U/S 338, 339, 351, 248, 308, 318, 61 AND 3(5) OF BNS, 2023.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34724 CRL.P No. 7328 of 2025 ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners, having argued the matter extensively, when this Court was not inclined to grant indulgence, sought leave to withdraw the petition. However, bearing in mind that the dispute primarily is between husband, wife and in-laws, this Court deems it to reserve liberty to the petitioners to approach this Court in the event the investigation officer files a final report.
Recording his submission, the captioned petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition after a final report. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15 CT: BHK