Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6811 (AP)

Chakka Venkateswarlu v. The Senior Divisional Manager,The Life Insurance

WP/8059/2009 · 2025-08-10

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010064852009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8059/2009 Between: 1. CHAKKA VENKATESWARLU, S/O.JALAIAH, R/O. EEPURUPALEM, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, DIVISONAL OFFICE, NELLORE 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION, OF INDIA, CHIRALA BRANCH, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents putting petitioner agency code in watch list and Differentiate under Writing and not considering his representation dated 28.11.2008 pending months together without taking any action as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unfair and consequently direct the 1st respondent to consider petitioner’s representation submitted to him on dated 28.11.2008 forthwith by allowing the petitioner to do business in normal condition as done in earlier before putting the petitioner’s name in Watch list and under Differentiate under writing and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 10548 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to receive and accept all the policies of the petitioner with normal conditions as done in earlier before putting his name in Watch list and Differentiate Under writing and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 42735 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to charge the interest rate on par with the other agents of the respondents without charging of 10.50%, on outstanding house loan of the petitioner for the remaining term and refund the amount already deducted excessively as per the rate of interest 10.50% to the Petitioner forthwith. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 15615 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Receive the additional material papers Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR POTTURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BATHULA RAJ KIRAN (SC FOR LIC ) The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is no more. Hence, no further orders are required in this writ petition. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.08.2025 KAS