Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:119277 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21592 of 2025 Applicant :- Prabhat Saini Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Yadav,Yashpal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. Heard Shri Yashpal Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused- applicant, Prabhat Saini, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 148 of 2025, under Sections 108, 351 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Chakeri, District Kanpur Nagar. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused- applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 8.3.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was not named in the FIR. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that at the time of incident, the applicant was lodged in jail in other case crime number. There is no evidence of abatement against the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that genuineness of recovered suicide note is not supported by the opinion of Hand Writing Expert. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that Section 108 of BNS would not attract against the applicant. In order to substantiate his submission, he has placed reliance upon the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case Prabhu versus State rep. by the Inspector of Police, reported in 2024 (0) Supreme (SC) 896. . He has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Prabhat Saini, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Ravi Prakash (Ashutosh Srivastava, J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad