IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60272 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-452 Year-2024 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Arvind Chaudhary @ Arvind Kumar Chaudhary S/O Late Satyanarayan Chaudhary Resident of Village- Makhadumganj, PS- Muffasil (Chapra), District- Saran ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anjani Parashar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 18-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mufassil (Chapra) P.S. Case No. 452 of 2024 for the offences registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. 3. On getting secret information regarding selling of illicit liquor at village Makhdumganj, police party reached there and arrested one person who disclosed his name as Rahul Kumar @ Teju. The apprehended person disclosed that petitioner fled away from the spot. It is alleged that 60 litre country made liquor, kept in a sack was recovered from the possession of apprehended person. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60272 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 2/2 on the disclosure statement of co-accused. Petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. He has no concern with the seized liquor. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Except disclosure statement of co- accused, there is no material against the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S. in preparation of seizure- list. Petitioner has six criminal antecedents out of which five cases belong to Excise Act. He is in custody since 09.06.2025. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the trial. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of 1st Special Judge, Excise, Saran at Chapra in connection with Mufassil (Chapra) P.S. Case No. 452 of 2024. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.) U T