SMT. KAJAL YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/20061/2025 · 2025-09-10
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68072 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68072 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 20061 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live-in life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. By bare perusal of the records, it appears that the petitioners have not moved any representation before the concerned police authorities regarding any threat being given to them by private respondents due to solemnization of marriage and as such, no cause of action survives in favour of petitioners to pursue the instant petition.
4. In view thereof, the present petition stands disposed of. September 11, 2025 #Vik/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Kajal Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad