04.12.2025 Ct. No. 30 S.L. No. 32 SM WPA 26728 of 2024 Md. Shamim Akhter Versus State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Mahammad Mahmud ……for the petitioner Mr. Suman Sengupta, sr. govt. adv. Mr. Sambuddha Dutta …….for the State 1. On hearing the learned counsels for the parties, it appears that the present writ application has been preferred being aggrieved by an order dated 21st December, 2023. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the State that the said order being appealable. The petitioner can prefer an appeal before the District Controller. The petitioner is also willing to do so. 3. Accordingly, the writ application is disposed of with the liberty granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned order herein within 30 days from the date of this order, which the District Controller being the respondent no. 2, shall consider, in accordance with law and pass a reasoned order on hearing the parties. 4. The writ application is disposed of. 5. Applications, if any, connected thereto stand disposed of consequently. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 2 7. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities. [Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]