2025:HHC:3057 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.MMO No:74 of 2025 Decided On : 21st February, 2025 __________________________________________________________ Atul Sen ...Petitioner Versus Jitender Kataik ...Respondent Coram HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA, VACATION JUDGE 1 Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner : Mr. Rajeshwar Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in compliance of orders dated 11.02.2025, the petitioner-accused [Atul Sen] had appeared before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Shimla, on 17.02.2025 and has also executed requisite bonds. It is further stated that pursuant to his appearance, the matter has now been fixed before Learned Trial Court on 01.04.2025. [Statement Taken on Record]. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2025:HHC:3057 - 2 - 2. In view of the facts and the statement as referred to above, no further orders are required to be passed, in the instant petition, and the same is accordingly, closed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) February 21, 2025 Vacation Judge (Shivender)