APHC010064822019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2933/2019 Between: 1. CH VVNAGESWARA RAJU, S/O HANUMANTHA RAJU, AGED 57 YEARS, OCC EX SARPANCH, R/O KOSURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. GORIPARTI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O BHASKAR RAO, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D NO. 11/120, GHANTASALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, 3. K MURALI KRISHNA, S/O VENKATESWAR RAO, AGED 39 YEARS, OCC CIVIL ENGINEER, R/O D NO. 311-11-1, KOMALA NAGAR, CHALLAPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING AT AMARAVATI,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TASK FORCE POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, 2 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SURYARAOPET TASK FORCE POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. ADDAGARLA RAMBABU, S/O S/O VEERASWAMY , AGED 48 YEARS, OCC LIC AGENT , R/O D.NO. 1-375, KANURU VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the action of the police respondents 1 to 4 in harassing me by requiring to attend the police station every day though I am not involved any offence and thereby preventing me from attending to cur duties as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and voilative of Article 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of constitution of India and consequently directs the respondents 1 to 4 not to interfere with the personal life of the petitioners and also civil disputes and pass such other order or orders as may be deem fit in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners by requiring him to attend the police station without registering any crime and also not to interfere with the civil disputes pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M K RAJ KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2933 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Heard Sri M.K.Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that the police summoned the petitioner to the police station in connection with an enquiry relating to Crime No.107 of 2016 and 353 of 2018 on the file of the Penamuluru Police Station. Except that, the respondent Police never summoned the petitioner to the Police Station, as alleged in the present Writ Petition and they will follow due procedure, established under the law, if they intend to summon the petitioner to the Police Station. 3. Recording the submission made by learned Additional Government Pleader, without going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission itself, observing that the respondent police shall follow due procedure established by the law, if they intend to summon the petitioner to 4 the Police Station, for any enquiry or investigation in connection with any crime or offence. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 21.08.2025 PSA 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2933 of 2019 Date: 21.08.2025 PSA