MOHAMMAD SULIMAN HAJAM v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE)
WP(C)/766/2025 · 2025-04-10
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6806 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6806 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 97 Suppl. list HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 766/2025 MOHAMMAD SULIMAN HAJAM …Petitioner/Appellant
Through: Ms. Suwaiba, Advocate
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE) ...Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI JUDGE
ORDER 10.04.2025
On account of the deficient fact statements in particular with reference to the property forming subject matter of the writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner when pointed out about the deficiency so obtaining which is disabling this Court to grant indulgence in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file fresh one bearing proper statement of facts. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR
10.04.2025. BISMA