107. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Naresh Rameshwar and another CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR 1. son has challenged the order dated 11.08.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jind, whereby in a petition filed by the respondents under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for grant of mainten pay Rs.12,000/ respondent No.2). 2. inclined to interfere in the impugned order, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. 3. 4. September 26 sanjeev IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR(F) Date of decision: Versus Rameshwar and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Raj Wadhwa, Advocate, and Ms. Sunita Wadhwa, Advocate, for the petitioner. ----- NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) By way of present criminal revision petition, the petitioner son has challenged the order dated 11.08.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jind, whereby in a petition filed by the respondents under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for grant of mainten pay Rs.12,000/- per month (Rs.6,000/- to respondent No.1 and Rs.6,000/ respondent No.2). After arguing for sometime and realizing that inclined to interfere in the impugned order, learned counsel for the wishes to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. September 26, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR(F)-1038-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.09.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondents NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Raj Wadhwa, Advocate, and Ms. Sunita Wadhwa, Advocate, for the petitioner. By way of present criminal revision petition, the petitioner- son has challenged the order dated 11.08.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jind, whereby in a petition filed by the respondents under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for grant of maintenance, he has been ordered to to respondent No.1 and Rs.6,000/- to and realizing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the impugned order, learned counsel for the wishes to withdraw the present petition. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No - son has challenged the order dated 11.08.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jind, whereby in a petition filed by the respondents ance, he has been ordered to to this Court is not inclined to interfere in the impugned order, learned counsel for the SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.09.29 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document