CWP-17106-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 130 SUSHMA KUMARI STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. Suresh Kumar Kaushik for the petitioner Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed, quashing the speaking order dated petitioner’s services dispensed with service vide le 2. A perusal of the impugned order shows that despite petitioner’s ineligibility, she was engaged as Extension Lecturer Gandhi Government College for Women, Bhiwani to non-availability Lecturers at that time. eligibility conditions (NET) nor has she per the policy for engaging Extension Lecturer dated 04.03.2020 Extension Lecturers 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Decided On: SUSHMA KUMARI ALIAS SUSHMA SHE Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Suresh Kumar Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia quashing the speaking order dated 18.01.2025, Annexure P ’s services for the post of Extension Lecturer (Chemistry) dispensed with on account of being ineligible, and etter dated 20.01.2025, Annexure P A perusal of the impugned order shows that despite petitioner’s ineligibility, she was engaged as Extension Lecturer Gandhi Government College for Women, Bhiwani bility of regular Assistant Professor at that time. However, even now, the petitioner does not fulfill eligibility conditions, as she has neither cle nor has she been awarded Ph.D. degree per the policy for engaging Extension Lecturer dated 04.03.2020 and amended instructions dated Extension Lecturers cannot be allowed to continue in service. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17106-2025 Decided On: 01.07.2025 EKHAWAT ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) . JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , Advocate Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. inter alia, seeking a writ of certiorari 18.01.2025, Annexure P-10, whereby the for the post of Extension Lecturer (Chemistry) have been , and she has been relieved from , Annexure P-11. A perusal of the impugned order shows that despite petitioner’s ineligibility, she was engaged as Extension Lecturer (Chemistry) at Rajiv Gandhi Government College for Women, Bhiwani, on 09.08.2014. It was due Assistant Professors and eligible Extension , the petitioner does not fulfill the eared National Eligibility Test degree in the subject concerned. As per the policy for engaging Extension Lecturers in Government Colleges and amended instructions dated 14.12.2023, ineligible cannot be allowed to continue in service. certiorari , whereby the have been has been relieved from A perusal of the impugned order shows that despite petitioner’s Rajiv t was due s and eligible Extension the National Eligibility Test As s , ineligible Aman Dua 2025.07.03 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-17106-2025 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the facts aforementioned. 4. In view Extension Lecturer can be taken to the impugned order dated 5. In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the present petition and it stands dismissed 01.07.2025 Ad Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? 2025 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the facts aforementioned. In view of the petitioner’s ineligibil Extension Lecturer and stipulation in policy dated 04.03.2020 can be taken to the impugned order dated 18.01.2025 In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the present petition and it stands dismissed in limine. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute of the petitioner’s ineligibility for engagement as licy dated 04.03.2020, no exception 18.01.2025. In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the present TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute for engagement as , no exception In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the present Aman Dua 2025.07.03 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document