Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 680 (UTT)

AAS MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/3/2025 · 2025-01-07

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS ABA No.3 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.0654 of 2024, under Section 305(a) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Gangnahar, District Haridwar Heard. At the very outset, learned State Counsel gives a statement that the applicant is not wanted in the case. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State Counsel. In view of the statement given by learned State Counsel, nothing survives in this anticipatory bail application. It stands disposed of, accordingly. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 07.01.2025 RV RAVI BISHT Digitally signed by RAVI BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=ded921477e34a304cbcb0b52d4a59f 37e6d2018d38d0b669a5c068799391e6bb, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AA64B1F44E60E652AE5485ED 764961E4E52FD29C6F03C20917020ED09340 5536, cn=RAVI BISHT Date: 2025.01.07 20:55:28 +05'30'