IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59373 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2024 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. Mintu Jha @ Bipin Kumar Jha @ Mintu Kumar Jha S/O Santosh Jha Resident of village- Hatbariya, Umgaon, PS- Harlakhi, Dist- Madhubani 2. Bittu Jha @ Pravin Kumar Jha @ Bittu Kumar Jha S/O Santosh Jha Resident of village- Hatbariya, Umgaon, PS- Harlakhi, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sah, Advocate For the State : Ms. Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 189(2), 127(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S.. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 07.10.2024 at about 5 PM, these petitioners asked son of informant to come at Banrva Gacchi with Rs. 2,00,000/- because they had a mobile phone and thereafter, these petitioners, along with 8 to 10 unknown persons, committed maar-peet with son of informant. It is further alleged that during maar-peet they took out Rs. 1,20,000/- from the pocket of son of informant. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59373 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/3 behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, son of informant purchased some mobile parts on credit from the shop of Petitioner No. 1 and when he demanded the money, a simple maar-peet took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, to be simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 182 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59373 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 3/3 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T