Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67986 (ALL)

RAHUL SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/8515/2025 · 2025-07-17

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:117101 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8515 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rahul Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Mr. Navin Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and Mr. Ashish Kumar Nagvanshi, learned counsel for respondent no. 4. 2. The present petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to cancel the online application bearing application no. 18900219 in the name of the petitioner, which has not been submitted by the petitioner (Annexure-1 to the writ petition). (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to submit a fresh online application for the purpose of his inter-district transfer." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to delete the first prayer, as the same has already been granted by cancelling the online application, as prayed by the petitioner. He next submits that vacancies are there for the inter-district transfer, therefore, the representation as given by him may be considered, in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 submits that in case petitioner moves fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2 within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad