GAGAN BIHARI BHUYAN v. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANGUL
WP(C)/36335/2025 · 2025-12-23
S K Panigrahi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67982 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67982 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.36335 of 2025
Gagan Bihari Bhuyan …. Petitioner Represented By Adv. Mr. Braja Mohan Sarangi -versus-
Superintendent of Police, Angul & Anr.. …. Opposite Parties Represented By ASC Mr. Rajdeep Pradhan
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
Order No.
ORDER 23.12.2025
01.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner being the owner of the vehicle in question bearing Registration No.OR-06-G-8739 (Truck) has sought for a direction from this Court to the Opposite Party No.2 for releasing the said vehicle which has been detained by the Inspector-in- Charge, Angul P.S./Opposite Party No.2.
3. Heard learned counsels for the Parties.
4. Learned counsel for the State, at the outset, submits that in order to redress his grievance, the Petitioner instead of preferring this Writ Petition should have p. 2p. 2 approached the Inspector-in-Charge of Angul P.S./ Opposite Party No.2 at the threshold of the matter.
5. At this juncture, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for granting permission to the Petitioner to do so.
6. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties and looking to the factual scenario of the case, this Court directs the Petitioner to approach the Inspector-in- Charge of Angul P.S./Opposite Party No.2 along with all the required documents for release of his vehicle in question within a period of ten days hence. In such event, the Opposite Party No.2 shall look into the grievance of the Petitioner and release the above noted vehicle of the Petitioner as per law.
7. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Sumitra