Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67980 (KAR)

MOHAMMED ISMAIL v. SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED.,

WP/33427/2024 · 2025-07-31

B M Shyam Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29950 WP No. 33427 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 33427 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MOHAMMED ISMAIL SON OF BASHA SAB AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 901 DASAPAP GARDEN CHAMUNDI NAGAR R T NAGAR BENGALURU 500 032 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAN KUMAR H G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED., REGISTERED OFFICE SIRI TOWERS, PLOT NO. 14A SOUTH PHASE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE GUINDY CHENNAI PIN CODE 600032 ALSO OFFICE AT NO. 2 AND 3 2ND FLOOR, MANNDI PLAZA ST MARKS ROAD, SHANTHIALANAGAR ASHOK NAGAR BANGALORE 560 001 REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER MR. DILEEP Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29950 WP No. 33427 of 2024 2. KHAN AND SONS TRADERS REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR IRAFANULLA KHAN NO.26, 6TH MAIN ROAD NEAR NEELAKANTESHWARA TEMPLE CHAMUNDINAGAR MAIN RAOD R T NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 032 3. IRAFANULLA KHAN S/O RHMATULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS NO.26, 6TH MAIN ROAD NEAR NEELAKANTESHWARA TEMPLE CHAMUNDINAGAR MAIN RAOD R T NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 032 4. SMT UMME SALMA W/O IRFAN ULLA KHA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT NO.26, 6TH MAIN ROAD NEAR NEELAKANTESHWARA TEMPLE CHAMUNDINAGAR MAIN RAOD R T NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 032 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED THE POSSESSION NOTICE UNDER SECTION 13(4) OF THE SECURITIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY ACT, 2002 (SARFAESI ACT) DTD 20.11.2024 IN REF NO. NIL AT ANNX-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29950 WP No. 33427 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The office objection is that Court fee is not paid and it has been unpaid for almost nine months. This Court can only discern lack of interest and therefore, the petition stands dismissed for default. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB