THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR v. HANMANT NAGORAO SALUNKE
FA/1581/2015 · 2025-12-04
Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67978 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67978 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
917 FA NO. 1579 OF 2015.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 1579 OF 2015
1. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Latur
2. The Executive Engineer Public Works Division Bandhkam Bhavan, Latur ….Appellants (Orig. Respondents) VERSUS Narayan Dhondiba Padre Age: 45 years Occu: Agri R/o Khadgaon, Tq. & Dist. Latur ….Respondent (Orig. Claimant) WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1580 OF 2015
1. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Latur
2. The Executive Engineer Public Works Division Bandhkam Bhavan, Latur ….Appellants (Orig. Respondents) VERSUS Suryabhan Dhondiba Padre Age: 40 years, Occu: Agri R/o Khadgaon, Tq. & Dist. Latur ….Respondent (Orig. Claimant) WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1583 OF 2015
1. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Latur
2. The Executive Engineer Public Works Division Bandhkam Bhavan, Latur ….Appellants 1 of 6
(( 2 )) 917 FA NO. 1579 OF 2015 VERSUS Jagannath S/o Nagorao Salunke (died) Through Lrs
1. Prafulla S/o Jagnnathrao Salunke, Age: 60 years, Occu: H.H.,
2. Narendra Jagnnathrao Salunke, Age: 60 years, Occu; Agri ….Respondents Both R/o Khadgaon, Tq. & Dist. Latur, At present flat No.5, Lotus Residency Near Mamta Nagar, Suyojit Law Nice Industrial Area satpar MIDC Nashik Tq. & Dist. Nashik WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1586 OF 2015
1. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Latur
2. The Executive Engineer Public Works Division Bandhkam Bhavan, Latur ….Appellants VERSUS Ramrao Laxman Padre (died) Through Lrs
1. Shivaji Ramrao Padre (salunke) Age; 65 years, Occu: Agri
2. Prabhu Ramrao Padre (salunke) Age: 60 years, Occu: Agri
3. Shatrughna Ramrao Padre (Salunke) Age: 65 yearsm Occu: Agri ...Respondents All R/o Khadgaon, Tq. & Dist. Latur 2 of 6
(( 3 )) 917 FA NO. 1579 OF 2015 … WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1577 OF 2015
1. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Latur
2. The Executive Engineer Public Works Division Bandhkam Bhavan, Latur ….Appellants VERSUS Sambhaji S/o Hariba Padre age: 55 years, Occu: Agri R/o Khadgaon, Tq & Disst. Latur ….Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1582 OF 2015
1. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Latur
2. The Executive Engineer Public Works Division Bandhkam Bhavan, Latur ….Appellants VERSUS Shivaji Bachesaheb Salunke Age: 45 years, Occu: Agri R/o Khadgaon, Tq. & Dist. Latur ...Respondent
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1578 OF 2015
1. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Latur
2.
The Executive Engineer Public Works Division Bandhkam Bhavan, Latur ….Appellants 3 of 6
(( 4 )) 917 FA NO. 1579 OF 2015 VERSUS Anant Nagorao Salunke Age: 30 years, Occu: Agri R/o. Khadgaon, Tq. & Dist. Latur ….Respondent WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1581 OF 2015
1. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Latur
2. The Executive Engineer Public Works Division Bandhkam Bhavan, Latur ….Appellants VERSUS Hanmant Nagorao Salunke Age: 36 years, Occu: Agri R/o Khadgaon, Tq. & Dist. Latur ...Respondent … Mr. D. J. Patil, AGP for State-Appellants in all matters Mr. S. S. Manale, Advocate for Respondents in all matters ….
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 04.12.2025 PER COURT :-
1. These appeals are preferred by the State against the common impugned judgment and award dated 29.09.2011 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur District Latur in L.A.R. Nos. 209/2003, 232/2003, 233/2003, 234/2003, 235/2003, 236/2003, 237/2003 and 662/2002. 4 of 6
(( 5 )) 917 FA NO. 1579 OF 2015
2. Learned AGP for the State pointed out that the S.L.A.O had granted compensation ranging from Rs.2,000/- to Rs.2,400/- per R for the acquired lands of the claimants. However, the Reference Court enhanced the said amount and awarded compensation ranging from Rs.5,600/- to Rs.7,000/- per R. Learned AGP further submitted that in view of the Government Resolution dated 03.11.2016 and the subsequent corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018, the State Government has resolved not to file or contest any appeal where the amount of compensation awarded by the Reference Court is within four times of the amount awarded by the S.L.A.O. He submitted that the First Appeals filed by the State deserve to be disposed of as per the policy decision of the State Government, as the compensation awarded by the Reference Court is not more than four times the amount awarded by the S.L.A.O.
3. Considering the submissions of the learned AGP as well as the policy decision of the State Government, the appeals deserve to be
disposed of. The First Appeals are disposed of accordingly.
4. The claimants have already withdrawn 75% of the compensation amount. The Registry is directed to pay the remaining 25% of the amount of compensation, along with the accrued interest 5 of 6
(( 6 )) 917 FA NO. 1579 OF 2015 thereon to the claimants. The Registry is further directed to deposit the said amount directly into the bank accounts of the claimants, if the details are submitted.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 6 of 6