KRISHAN PANDEY AND ORSD v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
CWP/27487/2015 · 2025-09-05
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67968 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67968 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
CWP-27487-2015 Date of Decision: 05.09.2025
Krishan Pandey and Others
...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Others
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to release ACP Scale as per modified Grade Pay.
2.
The petitioners are working with respondent as Dhobi/Cook. They are claiming that prior to 01.01.2006, they were getting pay band and grade pay Rs.2650-65-3300-EB-70-4000. They are entitled to revised pay band and grade pay Rs.4440+7440+1650.
3.
Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that respondent was initially disputing claim of petitioners, however, affidavit dated 17.11.2022 particularly Annexure R-5 vindicates stand of the petitioner.
4.
Faced with this, learned State counsel submits that claim of petitioners would be reconsidered in the light of Annexure R-5 filed along with reply dated 17.11.2022 read with Annexure P-4.
PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.09.05 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-27487-2015
-2-
5.
Faced with this, learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that petition may be disposed of.
6.
In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands
disposed of. Let the needful be done within three months from today.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 05.09.2025 Prince Chawla
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.09.05 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document