Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67968 (PNJ)

KRISHAN PANDEY AND ORSD v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/27487/2015 · 2025-09-05

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-27487-2015 Date of Decision: 05.09.2025 Krishan Pandey and Others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to release ACP Scale as per modified Grade Pay. 2. The petitioners are working with respondent as Dhobi/Cook. They are claiming that prior to 01.01.2006, they were getting pay band and grade pay Rs.2650-65-3300-EB-70-4000. They are entitled to revised pay band and grade pay Rs.4440+7440+1650. 3. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that respondent was initially disputing claim of petitioners, however, affidavit dated 17.11.2022 particularly Annexure R-5 vindicates stand of the petitioner. 4. Faced with this, learned State counsel submits that claim of petitioners would be reconsidered in the light of Annexure R-5 filed along with reply dated 17.11.2022 read with Annexure P-4. PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.09.05 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-27487-2015 -2- 5. Faced with this, learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that petition may be disposed of. 6. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of. Let the needful be done within three months from today. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 05.09.2025 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.09.05 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document