Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67953 (MAD)

RAJIV GANDHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING v. THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (LAW AND ORDER)

WP/20392/2024 · 2025-08-22

N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.20392 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.08.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR W.P.No.20392 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.22321 & 22322 of 2024 Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering and Technology, Represented by its Principal, Dr.Vijayakrishna Rapaka, Pondy – Cuddalore Main Road, Kirumambakkam, Puducherry – 607 403. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Senior Superintendent of Police (Law & Order), Puducherry. 2. The Superintendent of Police (South), Ariyankuppam, Puducherry – 605 007. 3. The Inspector of Police, Bahour Circle, Puducherry. 4. The Station House Officer, Kirumambakkam Police Station, Puducherry. 5. Rajiv Gandhi Engineering College Thozhilalargal Sangam (CITU), Regd. No.RTU/1516/2007, Represented by its President N.Kolanjiappan, Kirumambakkam, Puducherry – 607 402. ... Respondents 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20392 of 2024 PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or may other appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of writ, to direct respondents 1 to 4 herein forebearing the fifth respondent, the Members of the Sangam or their officers, members, servants, agents or any person acting for the fifth respondent sangam or at their behest from holding any demonstrations or dharnas or meetings or shouting slogans in front of the main gate/entrance of the Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering and Technology and within 300 meters of the Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering and Technology, premises located at Pondy – Cuddalore Main Road, Kirumambakkam, Puducherry – 607 403. For Petitioner : Mr.L.Swaminathan For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.V.Ramachandramurthy Additional Public Prosecutor Puducherry Assisted by Mr.M.Tamizhmani O R D E R The petition has been filed against the fifth respondent due to the agitation caused by them. However, it is now stated by the learned counsels appearing on both sides that the issues have been sorted out. Thereby, the prayer sought for by the petitioner has become infructuous. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20392 of 2024 2. In view of the above, no further orders are required in this petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. . 22.08.2025 ham Neutral Citation :Yes/No To 1. The Senior Superintendent of Police (Law & Order), Puducherry. 2. The Superintendent of Police (South), Ariyankuppam, Puducherry – 605 007. 3. The Inspector of Police, Bahalur Circle, Puducherry. 4. The Station House Officer, Kirumambakkam Police Station, Puducherry. 5. The Public Prosecutor (Puducherry), High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20392 of 2024 N. SATHISH KUMAR , J. ham W.P.No.20392 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.22321 & 22322 of 2024 22.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis