Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67949 (BOM)

RAJIV KACHRU KHILLARE v. ASTIK KUMAR PANDEY

CP/49/2023 · 2025-12-10

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 914-CP-49-23.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 49 OF 2023 RAJIV KACHRU KHILLARE VERSUS ASTIK KUMAR PANDEY AND OTHERS ... Mr. Mahesh Kalidas Bhosale, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. G. A. Kulkarni, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. Anand V. Indrale Patil, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 & 4 ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 10th DECEMBER, 2025 PER COURT : 1. Learned advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4 states that the order is complied with and they have deposited amount of Rs.28,68,089/- in the account of the petitioner. Learned advocate for petitioner confirms the same. 2. In view of compliance of the order, the contempt petition is disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH 2025:BHC-AUG:35283-DB