Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6794 (HP)

PARDEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/237/2025 · 2025-03-27

Rakesh Kainthla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MP (M) No. 237 of 2025 Date of Decision: 27.3.2025 Pradeep Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner : Mr. Dipanker Bagga, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General, with ASI Sanjay Sharma, IO, Police Station Tahliwal, District Una, H.P. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral) Status report stands filed which shows that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Keeping in view the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, the order dated 07.03.2025 is made absolute, however, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall join the investigation as and when directed to do so. (ii) The petitioner will attend the trial on each and every date of hearing and if he is unable to do so, he will seek an exemption from the court by filing an appropriate application, (iii) The petitioner will not intimidate the witnesses nor will he influence any evidence in any manner whatsoever, 2 (iv) The petitioner shall not seek unnecessary adjournments and do any other act to hamper the progress of the trial. (v) The petitioner will not leave the present address for a continuous period of seven days without furnishing the address of the intended visit to the SHO of concerned Police Station and the Court. (vi) The petitioner will furnish his mobile number, and social media contact to the Police and the Court and will abide by the summons/notices received from the Police/Court through SMS/WhatsApp/Social Media Account. In case of any change in the mobile number or social media accounts, the same will be intimated to the Police/Court within five days from the date of the change. 2. It is clarified that if the petitioner misuses the liberty or violates any of the conditions imposed upon him, the investigating agency shall be free to move this Court for cancellation of the bail. The petition stands accordingly disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous applications, if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 27th March, 2025 (Chander)