Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6794 (GUJ)

PRAVIN RAVINDRA SONVANE THROUGH ANUSHYABEN RAVI SONVANE v. STATE OF GUJARAT

CR.RA/1930/2024 · 2025-07-08

L S Pirzada

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/CR.RA/1930/2024 ORDER DATED: 08/07/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL) NO. 1930 of 2024 ========================================================== PRAVIN RAVINDRA SONVANE THROUGH ANUSHYABEN RAVI SONVANE Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: MR. RAAJEN D JADHAV(10026) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR DIPESH D SONI(9996) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MS. JYOTI BHATT for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA Date : 08/07/2025 ORAL ORDER 1. The present revision application has been preferred by the juvenile of his mother for regular bail in connection with the offence registered before the Dindoli Police Station, Surat for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148, 149, 34, 201 and 114 of Indian Penal Code under Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act and under Sections 3(2)(5) and 3(2)(5-a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act). 2. Heard learned advocate Mr.Raajen D. Jadhav for the applicant. It is submitted that the present juvenile has been R/CR.RA/1930/2024 ORDER DATED: 08/07/2025 arrested pursuant to the offence and he is in the remand home since 19.06.2024 and the present application has been preferred to her mother. Further, it is submitted that the present applicant had after filing of charge sheet has preferred bail application before the Juvenile Justice Board, Surat. The same was rejected thereafter. He has preferred an appeal under Section 101 of the Juvenile Justice (Protection Act) 2015 and said appeal came to be rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, hence the present revision application preferred. Further, it is submitted that the present juvenile is a child convicting in law (CCL) is concerned date at the time of commission of his offense his birth date is 26.05.2007 and now he already attain the majority. As per the FIR the present CCL has been shown as per the case of the prosecution the role attributed to the present applicant, the present CCL is concerned. He along with the other accused persons has given kick and fist blows to the deceased Vijay except there is no other allegations. Further it is submitted that as per the report of the Probation Officer, the case is not call under the proviso of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. Hence the present revision application is to be allowed and the present juvenile accused be released on bail. 3. Learned APP Ms. Jyoti Bhatt vehemently opposed said R/CR.RA/1930/2024 ORDER DATED: 08/07/2025 revision application and submitted that in the present juvenile revision on bail there is a chance that present juvenile to come into contact with criminal for expose to the person to moral, physical and psychological danger and ends of justice. 4. Learned advocate Mr.Dipesh D. Soni for the respondent No.2 original complainant vehemently opposed said application and submitted that present revision application is required to be considering rival submission of the party. 5. Perusing the police papers and the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surat rejecting the appeal under Section 101 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. So far it is admitted position at the time of commission of the offence, present applicant was juvenile, further, the role attributed to the present applicant is only given kick and fist blows to the deceased Viijay except there is no allegation even no case of the prosecution that the present juvenile was used the weapon. Further, learned APP also placed on record report of the Probation Officer and from the report of the Probation Officer there is nothing adverse has been coming or there is nothing has been coming for believing this Court that release of this present juvenile like to bring present applicant in association with non criminal or expose the said person to moral, physical R/CR.RA/1930/2024 ORDER DATED: 08/07/2025 and psychological danger or the persons defeat the ends of justice. Hence considering this the present revision application is required to be considered. Thus further forgoing reason is criminal revision application is allowed and the child in conflict with law. Present applicant is order to be release on bail on following conditions:- (a) The child is no in conflict with major personal bond sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety of like amount from his mother to the satisfaction of the learned Juvenile Justice Board be Probation officer shall be appointed for the CCL who shall maintain general overside and supervision over the present juvenile as may be deemed necessary to ensure that he does not any undesirable company and is not expose to any moral, physical or psychological danger or that is release in any manner defeat the end of the justice till the conclusion of the trial. Direct service permitted. (L. S. PIRZADA, J) HRT Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIMAL RAKESHKUMAR TRIVEDI(HCD0071), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/07/2025 18:32:44